Histochem Cytochem 2006, 44:65–71 19 Vander Ploeg MJ, Vanden Be

Histochem Cytochem 2006, 44:65–71. 19. Vander Ploeg MJ, Vanden Berg JH, Bhattacharjee S, Dehaan LH, Ershov DS, Fokkink RG: In vitro

nanoparticle toxicity to rat alveolar cells and coelomocytes from the earthworm Lumbricus rubellus. Nanotoxicology 2012, 8:28–37. doi:10.3109/17435390.744857CrossRef 20. Nel A, Xia T, Madler L, Li N: Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 2006, 311:622–627.CrossRef 21. Wardak A, Gorman ME, Swami N, Deshpande S: Identification of risks in the life cycle of nanotechnology-based products. J Indian Ecol 2008,12(3):435–448.CrossRef 22. Zha CS, Mao HK, Hemley RJ: Elasticity of MgO and a primary pressure scale to 55 GPa. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2000, 97:13494–13499.CrossRef 23. Benn TM, Westerhoff ICG-001 supplier P: Nanoparticle

silver released into water from commercially available sock fabrics. Environ Sci Technol 2008,42(11):4133–4139.CrossRef 24. Kiser MA, Westorhoff P, Benn T, Wang Y, Perriz Rivera J, Hristovski K: Titanium nanomaterial removal and release from wastewater treatment plants. Environ Sci Technol 2009, 43:6757–6783.CrossRef 25. Mueller NC, Nowak B: Environmental impacts of nanosilver. Environ Sci Technol 2008, 42:4447–4453.CrossRef 26. Gottschalk F, Sonderer T, Scholz RW, Nowwack B: Modelled BMS-777607 environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO 2 , ZnO, Ag, CNT, fullerenes) for different regions. Environ Sci Technol 2009,43(24):9216–9222.CrossRef 27. Brousseau KR, Dunier M, De Guise S, Fournier M: Marqueurs immunologiques. In Biomarqueurs en Ecotoxicologie & Aspects Fondamentaux. Edited by: Lagadic L, Caquet T, Amiard JC, Ramade F. Paris: SB-3CT Masson; 1997:287–315. 28. Eyambe SG, Goven AJ, Fitzpatrick LC, Venables BJ, Cooper EL: A non-invasive technique for sequential collection of earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris) leukocytes during subchronic immunotoxicity studies. Lab Anim 1991, 25:61–70.CrossRef 29. Brousseau P, Fugere N, Bernier J, Coderre D, Nadeau D, Poirier G, Fournier M: Evaluation of earthworm exposure to contaminated soil by cytometric assay of ceolomocytes phagocytosis in Lumbricus terrestris (Oligochaeta).

Soil Biol Biochem 1997, 29:681–684.CrossRef 30. Brousseau P, Payette Y, Tryphonas H, Blakley B, Boermans H, Flipo D, Fournier M: Manual of Immunological Methods. Boca Raton: CRC; 1999. 31. Singh NP, Mc Coy MT, Tice RR, Schneider EL: A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp Cell Res 1988, 175:184–191.CrossRef 32. Collins N, McManus R, Wooster R, Mangion J, Seal S, Lakhani SR: Consistent loss of the wild type allele in breast cancers from a family linked to the BRCA2 gene on chromosome 13q12–13. Oncogene 1995, 10:1673–1675. 33. Yang X, Gondikas AP, Marinakos SM, Auffan M, Liu J, Hsu-Kim H: Mechanism of silver nanoparticle toxicity is dependent on dissolved silver and surface coating in Caenorhabditis elegans. Environ Sci Technol 2011, 46:1119–1127.CrossRef 34.

Surgery 2009, 146:749–755 PubMedCrossRef 7 Bhatia P, Fortin D, I

Surgery 2009, 146:749–755.PubMedCrossRef 7. Bhatia P, Fortin D, Inculet RI, Malthaner RA: Current concepts in the management of oesophageal perforations: a twenty-seven

year Canadian experience. MI-503 supplier Ann Thorac Surg 2011, 92:209–215.PubMedCrossRef 8. Santos GH, Frater RW: Transesophageal irrigation for the treatment of mediastinitis produced by Esophageal rupture. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986,91(1):57–62.PubMed 9. Linden PA: Modified T-tube repair of delayed Esophageal perforation results in a low mortality rate similar to that seen with acute perforations. Ann Thorac Surg 2007,83(3):1129–1133.PubMedCrossRef 10. Freeman RK: Esophageal stent placement for the treatment of iatrogenic Staurosporine nmr intrathoracic Esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg 2007,83(6):2003–2007.PubMedCrossRef 11. Kuppusamy MK: Evolving management strategies in Esophageal perforation: surgeons using nonoperative techniques to improve outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 2011,213(1):164–171.PubMedCrossRef 12. Koivukangas V, Biancari F, Meriläinen S, Ala-Kokko T, Saarnio J: Esophageal stenting for spontaneous Esophageal perforation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012,73(4):1011–1013.PubMedCrossRef 13. Fischer A: Nonoperative treatment of 15

benign Esophageal perforations with self-expandable covered metal stents. Ann Thorac Surg 2006,81(2):467–472.PubMedCrossRef 14. Urschel HC Jr, Razzuk MA, Wood RE, et al.: Improved management of Esophageal perforation: exclusion and diversion in continuity. Ann Surg

1974,179(5):587–591.PubMedCrossRef 15. Orringer MB, Stirling MC: Esophagectomy for Esophageal disruption. Ann Thorac Surg 1990, 49:35–4216.PubMedCrossRef 16. Eroglu A: Current management of Esophageal perforation: 20 years experience. Dis Oesophagus 2009,22(4):374–380.CrossRef 17. Kiernan PD, Sheridan MJ, Hettrick V, Vaughan B, Graling P: Thoracic Esophageal perforation: one surgeon’s experience. Dis Oesophagus 2006,19(1):24–30.CrossRef 18. Richardson JD: Management of Esophageal perforations: the value of aggressive surgical treatment. Am J Surg 2005,190(2):161–165.PubMedCrossRef 19. Vallböhmer D: Options in the management of Esophageal perforation: Urocanase analysis over a 12-year period. Dis Oesophagus 2010,23(3):185–190.CrossRef 20. Keeling WB, Miller DL, Lam GT, Kilgo P, Miller JI, Mansour KA: Force SD: Low mortality after treatment for Esophageal perforation: a single-center experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2010,90(5):1669–1673.PubMedCrossRef 21. Wu JT, Mattox KL, Wall MJ, Wall MJ JR: Esophageal perforations: new perspectives and treatment paradigms. J Trauma 2007,63(5):1173–1184.PubMedCrossRef 22. Hasimoto CN, Cataneo C, Eldib R, Thomazi R, Pereira RS, Minossi JG, Cataneo AJ: Efficacy of surgical versus conservative treatment in Esophageal perforation: a systematic review of case series studies. Acta Cir Bras 2013,28(4):266–271.PubMedCrossRef 23.

In most reported works, the case of a ‘monomolecular’

In most reported works, the case of a ‘monomolecular’ selleck chemicals adlayer of porphyrin was considered. According to our previously

reported results, as-deposited gold films have a semi-crystallic nature, with several detectable crystallographic orientations. During annealing, due to a phase transition followed by atom rearrangements, the crystallographic orientation Au (111) becomes preferable [44]. On the other hand, we deal with porphyrin layers that are sufficiently thicker than monomolecular film. So in our case, a dependence of the optical properties on mutual crystallographic orientation (coplanar or perpendicular orientation of the porphyrin), on the distance between the porphyrin and gold substrate, and/or on the shape of the gold nanoparticles is not assumed. The prepared nanostructures exhibit interesting optical properties and have a promising potential for different applications

in photonics, energy conversion, and analytical methods [45, 46]. Combination of gold islands arises, whose sizes and optical properties can be controlled by subsequent annealing [47]. The gold with the deposited layer of porphyrin was used to enhance the resolution of optical spectroscopy. Gold-porphyrin films will found their application in light-harvesting systems for photocurrent generation [48]. These structures will also be useful in the reduction of molecular oxygen [33, 49]. Another attractive application of gold-porphyrin nanosystems lies in the preparation of multibit information storage devices [50]. Additionally, gold electrodes modified by porphyrin https://www.selleckchem.com/products/ABT-263.html or porphyrin-fullerene systems will be used for artificial photosynthesis [51, 52]. Moreover, self-assembled porphyrins on Au surface can serve as enantioselective sensors or biosensors [53, 54]. Conclusions The preparation of two different porphyrin/gold Loperamide and gold/porphyrin/gold systems is described. A slight enhancement of the luminescence intensity was found in the case of the porphyrin/Au structure. Additional luminescence enhancement was observed after sample annealing. The enhancement

is related to disintegration of the initially continuous gold film into an island-like structure and to excitation of surface plasmons. A sandwich gold/porphyrin/gold system with porphyrin intermediate layer was also studied. In this case, suppression of one of the two luminescence maxima and sufficient enhancement of the second one were observed. Acknowledgements This work was supported by the GA CR under the projects 108/11/P840 and 108/12/1168. References 1. Maier SA: Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications. New York: Springer; 2007:201. 2. Kelly KL, Coronado E, Zhao LL, Schatz GC: The optical properties of metal nanoparticles: the influence of size, shape, and dielectric environment. J Phys Chem B 2003, 107:668–677.CrossRef 3.

07) Fourteen bacterial classes were differentially abundant betw

07). Fourteen bacterial classes were differentially abundant between ws and ps (FDR ~0.06), most notably Clostridia, which was enriched for in ws. Both fruit surface environments were enriched

for Gammaproteobacteria. Despite the differences observed between water sources, no significant differences were found between the two fruit surface environments (this includes an attempt in which the ps4 outlier was removed). At the genus level, significant differences were found between water sources, with 30 genera showing differential abundance (P < 0.05). Table 1 lists the bacterial genera among these representing 1% or more of the sequences in either of the water sources analyzed. Fruit surface environments were highly variable and no significant differences were detected for the high abundance genera, which included Pantoea, Enterobacter, Sphingomonas, selleckchem Leuconostoc, Pseudomonas and Burkholderia (Additional file 2). The less abundant genera Paenibacillus, Stenotrophomonas, Bacillus and Lactococcus were more abundant in pg, while Frigoribacterium, Herbaspirillum, Rickettsia, Wautersiella and Cloacibacterium were more abundant in ps. None of these genera represented more than 0.2% of

the population. Table 1 Bacterial genera with differential abundance in ground and surface water sources. Genus Groundwater Surface water p-value   Mean St. error Mean St. error   Acidovorax 0.018 0.005 0.001 0.001 0.039 Burkholderia 0.744 0.046 0.001 0.000 0.001 Clostridium 0.001 0.001 0.014 0.003 0.024 NVP-BEZ235 GpIIa 0.000 0.000 0.011 0.002 0.017 Ilumatobacter 0.000 0.000 0.011 0.003 0.025 Methylocystis 0.009 0.002

0.082 0.007 0.007 Mycobacterium 0.001 0.000 0.032 0.008 0.035 Polynucleobacter 0.000 0.000 0.016 0.001 0.008 Ralstonia 0.016 0.003 0.000 0.000 0.021 Spartobacteria_genera_incertae_sedis 0.000 0.000 0.078 0.009 0.010 Unclassified 0.110 0.021 0.684 0.019 0.000 Average relative abundance of sequences assigned to that genus (Mean), standard error of the corresponding average (St. error) and p-value describing the significance of the differential abundance observed between the two populations, for genera representing at least 1.0% of the sequences in pheromone either of the water sources. The computed FDR of these genera is 0.05, thus we expect that less than 1 of the 11 represent false positives. A statistical comparison of the 2008 and 2009 fruit surface samples (not considering variability between 2009 replicates) indicated that in both the 454 and Sanger data, Bacilli is enriched in the ps samples, and Gammaproteobacteria is enriched in pg (Figure 2A). At the genus level, Pantoea showed high abundance in both years (Figure 2B). Enterobacter, Pseudomonas, Sphingomonas and Burkholderia were more predominant in the 2009 samples, while a larger proportion of the 2008 sequences remained unclassified.

Nano Lett 2006, 6:1589–1593 10 1021/nl060331vCrossRef 10 Hashim

Nano Lett 2006, 6:1589–1593. 10.1021/nl060331vCrossRef 10. Hashimoto A, Suenaga K, Gloter A, Urita K, Iijima S: Direct evidence for atomic defects in graphene layers. Nature 2004, 430:870–873. 10.1038/nature02817CrossRef 11. Lee GD, Wang CZ, Yoon E, Hwang NM, Kim DY, Ho KM: Diffusion, coalescence, and reconstruction of vacancy defects in graphene layers. Phys Rev Lett 2005, 95:205501–1-4.CrossRef 12. Nika DL,

Pokatilov EP, Askerov AS, Balandin AA: Phonon thermal conduction in graphene: role of Umklapp selleckchem and edge roughness scattering. Phys Rev B 2009, 79:155413–1-12.CrossRef 13. Hao F, Fang D, Xu Z: Mechanical and thermal transport properties of graphene with defects. Appl Phys Lett 2011, 99:041901–1-3. 10.1063/1.3615290CrossRef 14. Chien S, Yang Y, Chen C: Influence of hydrogen functionalization on thermal conductivity of graphene: nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations. Appl Phys Lett 2011, 98:033107–1-3. 10.1063/1.3543622CrossRef 15. Yang P, Wang XL, Li P, Wang H, Zhang LQ, Xie FW: The effect

of doped nitrogen and vacancy on thermal conductivity of graphenenanoribbon from nonequilibrium molecular dynamics. RG-7388 Acta Phys Sin 2012, 61:076501–1-8. in Chinese 16. Yao HF, Xie YE, Tao O, Chen YP: Thermal transport of graphene nanoribbons embedding linear defects. Acta Phys Sin 2013, 62:068102–1-7. in Chinese 17. Xu Y, Chen X, Wang JS, Gu BL, Duan W: Thermal transport in graphene junctions and quantum dots. Phys Rev B 2012, 81:195425–1-7.CrossRef 18. Huang Z, Fisher TS, Murthy

JY: Simulation of thermal conductance across dimensionally mismatched graphene interfaces. J Appl Phys 2010, 108:114310–1-7. 10.1063/1.3514119CrossRef 19. Ye ZQ, Cao BY, Guo ZY: High and anisotropic thermal conductivity of body-centered tetragonal C 4 calculated using molecular dynamics. Carbon 2014, 66:567–575.CrossRef 20. Hu GJ, Cao BY: Thermal resistance between crossed carbon nanotubes: molecular dynamics simulations and analytical modeling. J Appl Phys 2013, 114:224308–1-8. 10.1063/1.4842896CrossRef SPTLC1 21. Li YW, Cao BY: A uniform source-and-sink scheme for calculating thermal conductivity by nonequilibrium molecular dynamics. J Chem Phys 2010, 133:024106–1-5. 10.1063/1.3463699CrossRef 22. Hu GJ, Cao BY: Molecular dynamics simulations of heat conduction in multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Mol Simulat 2012, 38:823–829. 10.1080/08927022.2012.655731CrossRef 23. Cao BY, Kong J, Xu Y, Yung K, Cai A: Polymer nanowire arrays with high thermal conductivity and superhydrophobicity fabricated by a nano-molding technique. Heat Transfer Eng 2013, 34:131–139. 10.1080/01457632.2013.703097CrossRef 24. Yao WJ, Cao BY: Thermal wave propagation in graphene studied by molecular dynamics simulations. Chin Sci Bull 2014, 27:3495–3503.CrossRef 25. Hu J, Ruan X, Chen YP: Thermal conductivity and thermal rectification in graphene nanoribbons: a molecular dynamics study. Nano Lett 2009, 9:2730–2735. 10.1021/nl901231sCrossRef 26.

In both areas there is a large contingent of meso-hygrophilous sp

In both areas there is a large contingent of meso-hygrophilous species, favoured by the presence of surface water, probably due to the proximity of small springs. There are many putative host plants in both truffières: at Feudozzo (Abruzzo) poplar (Populus tremula L.), oak (Q. cerris), willow (Salix alba L., Salix apennina Skvortsov, Salix caprea L. and Salix purpurea L.), hornbeam (Carpinus

betulus L. and Carpinus orientalis Miller) and hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.); at Collemeluccio (Molise) poplar (P. nigra and P. canadensis L.), oak (Q. cerris), linden (Tilia platyphyllos Scop.), silver fir (Abies alba Miller), hazelnut (C. avellana) and hornbeam (O. carpinifolia). However, all T. magnatum collection occurred beneath A. alba. The geological substratum is represented by alternating argillaceous sandstone: selleckchem at Feudozzo, the soil has a CaCO3 content ranging from 0.75 to p38 MAPK activity 4.20% and a pH of 6.8-7.8; at Collemeluccio the soil has a CaCO3 content ranging from 1.69 to 2.64% and a pH of 6.8-7.4. As production areas are often of different dimensions and their

productivity varies considerably, in the experimental truffière productive plots of 300–500 m2 were selected on the basis of the confidential indications of their productivity provided by local truffle hunters and their real productivity was established over the three years of the study. A total of 39 plots (9 in Tuscany, 9 in Emilia Romagna, 9 in Molise and 12 in Abruzzo) were

identified and delimited. Details of the pedological and vegetative characteristics of each experimental truffière plot are described in the project website [36–38]. Assessment of truffle production We used trained dogs to assess truffle production every week in the T. magnatum season (September-December) Mannose-binding protein-associated serine protease for three consecutive years (2008–2010). The truffles collected were numbered, weighed and recorded for each plot. Experimental layout Soil cores (1.6 cm diameter, 30 cm deep) were extracted using a disposable, cylindrical, polyvinyl chloride tube inserted inside a steel soil borer, purpose-built for this study. A set of 9 equidistant soil cores were taken from each plot along two diagonal lines, excluding a border area of 5 m on each side of the plot to minimize possible edge effects. Sampling was carried out in January 2009, 2010 and 2011 at the end of the annual white truffle season. The soil cores collected from each plot were pooled together to obtain a sample per plot for each year and any root fragments, stones or organic debris were carefully removed using a stereomicroscope. A control soil sample was also collected 200 m outside each experimental truffière from non-productive areas.

28 Konkel ME, Christensen JE, Keech AM, Monteville MR, Klena JD,

28. Konkel ME, Christensen JE, Keech AM, Monteville MR, Klena JD, Garvis SG: Identification of a fibronectin-binding domain within the Campylobacter jejuni CadF protein. DNA Damage inhibitor Mol Microbiol 2005, 57:1022–1035.CrossRefPubMed 29. Saitou N, Nei M:

The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic tree. Mol Biol Evol 1987, 4:406–425.PubMed 30. Koebnik R: Proposal for a peptidoglycan-associating alpha-helical motif in the C-terminal regions of some bacterial cell-surface proteins. Mol Microbiol 1995, 16:1269–1270.CrossRefPubMed 31. Krause-Gruszczynska M, van Alphen LB, Oyarzabal OA, Alter L, Hanel I, schliephake A, Konig W, van Putten JM, Konkel ME: Expression patterns and role of the CadF protein in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2007, 274:9–16.CrossRefPubMed 32. Yu F, Lyer D, Anaya C, Lewis JP: Identification and characterization of a cell surface protein of Prevotella intermedia 17 with broad spectrum binding activity for extra cellular matrix proteins. Proteomics 2006, 6:6023–6032.CrossRefPubMed 33. Kuznetsova E, Proudfoot M, Gonzalez CF, Brown G, Omelchenko MV, Borozan I, Carmel L, Wolf YI, Mori H, Savchenko AV, Arrowsmith CH, Koonin EV, Edwards AM, Yakunin AF: Genome-wide analysis of substrate specificities of the Escherichia coli haloacid dehalogenase-like phosphatase family. J Biol Chem 2006, 47:36149–36161.CrossRef

34. Sambrook J, Russell DW: Molecular Cloning; a laboratory manual. 3 Edition Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press., Cold Spring harbor, N. Y 2001. 35. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ: CLUSTAL Apitolisib molecular weight W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic acids Res 1994, 22:4673–4680.CrossRefPubMed Authors’ contributions JH, TS, AT and IT were involved with cloning, sequencing and for analysis of the rRNA gene sequences from Campylobacter strains. JEM and BCM participated in its design and coordination, and review of the manuscript. MM participated in design of the study, collected strains, drafted the manuscript and reviewed

the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version.”
“Background Helicobacter pylori colonizes about half of the human population and is associated with several gastrointestinal diseases, such as gastritis, peptic ulcer, and gastric cancer [1, 2]. The similar pattern of human and H. pylori geographic diversity and distribution suggests a co-evolution between bacteria and man, which can be used to understand human migrations [2]. The H. pylori distribution pattern follows the human migration roots, which suggests that the colonization of the human stomach occurred before modern man left East Africa [2–5]. Several H. pylori gene alleles present different prevalence rates among the world H. pylori population. This is the case for vacA that presents allelic diversity of the s-, m- and i-region [6, 7].

Figure A3 Shrinking of SML resist surface due to SEM imaging Th

Figure A3. Shrinking of SML resist surface due to SEM imaging. The panels show the micrographs (a) after first scan at low magnification, and (b) after second scan at high magnification. Observe the unexposed surfaces alongside the grating patterns. (PDF 106 KB) References 1. Rooks MJ, Kratschmer E, Viswanathan R, Katine J, Fontana RE, MacDonald SA: Low stress development of poly(methylmethacrylate) for high aspect ratio structures. J Vac Sci Technol B 2002, 20:2937–2941.CrossRef 2. Lewis S, Piccirillo www.selleckchem.com/products/apo866-fk866.html L: Influence of nanocomposite materials for next generation nano lithography. In Advances in Diverse Industrial

Applications of Nanocomposites. Rijeka: InTech; 2011:475–500. 3. Yan M, Choi S, Subramanian KRV, Adesida I: The effects of molecular weight on the exposure Epigenetics activator characteristics of poly(methylmethacrylate) developed at low temperatures. J Vac Sci Technol B 2008, 26:2306–2310.CrossRef 4. Gorelick S, Vila-Comamala J, Guzenko V, Mokso R, Stampanoni M, David C: Direct e-beam writing of high aspect ratio nanostructures in PMMA: a tool for diffractive X-ray optics fabrication. Microelectron Eng 2010, 87:1052–1056.CrossRef 5. Gorelick S, Guzenko VA, Vila-Comamala J, David C: Direct e-beam writing of dense and high aspect ratio nanostructures in thick layers of PMMA for electroplating. Nanotechnology 2010, 21:295303.CrossRef

6. Tobing LYM, Tjahjana L, Zhang DH: Large contrast enhancement by sonication assisted cold development process for low dose and ultrahigh resolution patterning on ZEP520A positive tone resist. J Vac Sci Technol B 2012, 30:051601.CrossRef

7. Li Q, Zhang L, Chen M, Fan S: A process study of electron beam nano-lithography and deep etching with an ICP system. Sci China Ser E-Tech Sci 2009, 52:1665–1671.CrossRef 8. Cui B, Veres T: High resolution electron beam lithography of PMGI using solvent developers. Microelectron Eng 2008, 85:810–813.CrossRef 9. Karbasian G, Fay PJ, Xing H, Jena D, Orlov AO, Snider GL: High aspect ratio features in poly(methylglutarimide) Vitamin B12 using electron beam lithography and solvent developers. J Vac Sci Technol B 2012, 30:06FI01.CrossRef 10. Yang H, Jin A, Luo Q, Gu C, Cui Z, Chen Y: Low-energy electron beam lithography of hydrogen silsesquioxane. Microelectron Eng 2006, 83:788–791.CrossRef 11. Henschel W, Georgiev YM, Kurz H: Study of a high contrast process for hydrogen silsesquioxane as a negative tone electron beam resist. J Vac Sci Technol B 2003, 21:2018–2025.CrossRef 12. Mirza MM, Zhou H, Velha P, Li X, Docherty KE, Samarelli A, Ternent G, Paul DJ: Nanofabrication of high aspect ratio (∼50:1) sub-10 nm silicon nanowires using inductively coupled plasma etching. J Vac Sci Technol B 2012, 30:06FF02.CrossRef 13. Vila-Comamala J, Gorelick S, Guzenko VA, David C: 3D nanostructuring of hydrogen silsesquioxane resist by 100 keV electron beam lithography. J Vac Sci Technol B 2011, 29:06F301.CrossRef 14.

J Mol Biol 1996, 263:525–530 CrossRefPubMed 24 Senes A, Gerstein

J Mol Biol 1996, 263:525–530.CrossRefPubMed 24. Senes A, Gerstein M, Engelman DM: Statistical analysis of amino acid patterns in transmembrane helices: the GxxxG motif occurs frequently and in association with β-branched residues at neighboring positions. J Mol Biol 2000, 296:921–936.CrossRefPubMed 25. Russ WP, Engelman DM: The GxxxG motif: a framework for transmembrane helix-helix association. J Mol Biol 2000, Pexidartinib in vitro 296:911–919.CrossRefPubMed 26. Kleiger G, Grothe R,

Mallick P, Eisenberg D: GXXXG and AXXXA: common α-helical interaction motifs in proteins, particularly in extremophiles. Biochemistry 2002, 41:5990–5997.CrossRefPubMed 27. Pace CN, Scholtz JM: A helix propensity scale based on experimental studies of peptides and proteins. Biophys J 1998, 75:422–427.CrossRefPubMed 28. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A: EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends Genet 2000, 16:276–277.CrossRefPubMed 29. Needleman

SB, this website Wunsch CD: A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J Mol Biol 1970, 48:443–453.CrossRefPubMed 30. Notredame C, Higgins DG, Heringa J: T-Coffee: a novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J Mol Biol 2000, 302:205–217.CrossRefPubMed 31. Lifson S, Sander C: Specific recognition in the tertiary structure of β-sheets of proteins. J Mol Biol 1980, 139:627–639.CrossRefPubMed 32. Wouters MA, Curmi PM: An analysis of side chain interactions and pair correlations within antiparallel β-sheets: the differences between backbone hydrogen-bonded and non-hydrogen-bonded residue pairs. Proteins 1995, 22:119–131.CrossRefPubMed 33. Roussel A, Cambillau C: TURBO-FRODO. Silicon Graphics, Mountain View, CA 1991. 34. DeLano WL: The PyMol molecular graphics system. DeLano Scientific, Palo Alto, CA 2002. 35. Cuff JA, Clamp ME, Siddiqui AS, Finlay M, Barton GJ: JPred: a consensus secondary structure prediction server. Bioinformatics 1998, 14:892–893.CrossRefPubMed 36. McGuffin LJ, Bryson K, Jones DT: The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server. Bioinformatics 2000, 16:404–405.CrossRefPubMed 37. Kneller DG, Cohen FE, Langridge R: Improvements in CYTH4 protein

secondary structure prediction by an enhanced neural network. J Mol Biol 1990, 214:171–182.CrossRefPubMed 38. PROF – secondary structure prediction system[http://​www.​aber.​ac.​uk/​~hiwww/​prof/​] 39. Pollastri G, Przybylski D, Rost B, Baldi P: Improving the prediction of protein secondary structure in three and eight classes using recurrent neural networks and profiles. Proteins 2002, 47:228–235.CrossRefPubMed Authors’ contributions BT devised and implemented the database extraction procedures and the statistical tests. SM identified the FliH repeats and preliminary statistical preferences for positions x1 to x3. Both authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript and in preparation of figures. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Radiology 2004, 231:491–499 PubMedCrossRef 17 Zielhuis SW, Nijse

Radiology 2004, 231:491–499.PubMedCrossRef 17. Zielhuis SW, Nijsen JFW, De Roos R, Krijger GC, Van Rijk PP, Hennink WE, Van het Schip AD: Production of GMP-grade radioactive holmium loaded poly(l-lactic acid) microspheres for clinical application. Int J Pharm 2006, 311:69–74.PubMedCrossRef 18. Zielhuis SW, Nijsen JFW, Dorland L, Krijger GC, Van het

Schip AD, Hennink WE: Removal of chloroform from biodegradable therapeutic microspheres by radiolysis. selleck compound Int J Pharm 2006, 315:67–74.PubMedCrossRef 19. Zielhuis SW, Nijsen JFW, Krijger GC, Van het Schip AD, Hennink WE: Holmium-loaded poly(L-lactic acid) microspheres: In vitro degradation study. Biomacromolecules 2006, 7:2217–2223.PubMedCrossRef 20. Nijsen JFW, Rook D, Brandt CJWM, Meijer R, Dullens H, Zonnenberg BA, De Klerk JMH, Van Rijk PP, Hennink WE, Van het Schip AD: Targeting of liver tumour in rats by selective delivery of holmium-166 loaded microspheres: a biodistribution study. Eur J Nucl Med 2001, 28:743–749.PubMedCrossRef 21. Nijsen JFW: Radioactive holmium poly(L-lactic acid) microspheres for treatment of hepatic malignancies: efficacy in rabbits. PhD Thesis, Utrecht University, Tthe Netherlands Y-27632 research buy 2001, 109–122. 22. Zielhuis SW, Nijsen JFW, Seppenwoolde JH, Bakker CJG, Krijger GC, Dullens HF, Zonnenberg BA, Van Rijk PP, Hennink WE, Van het Schip AD: Long-term toxicity

of holmium-loaded poly(L-lactic acid) microspheres in rats. Biomaterials 2007, 28:4591–4599.PubMedCrossRef Proton pump inhibitor 23. Vente MAD, Nijsen JFW, De Wit TC, Seppenwoolde JH, Krijger GC, Seevinck PR, Huisman A, Zonnenberg BA, Van den Ingh TSGAM, Van het Schip AD: Clinical effects of transcatheter hepatic arterial embolization with holmium-166 poly(L: -lactic acid) microspheres in healthy pigs. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008, 35:1259–1271.PubMedCrossRef 24. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Berman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, De Haes JC, et al.: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993, 85:365–376.PubMedCrossRef

25. Bolch WE, Bouchet LG, Robertson JS, Wessels BW, Siegel JA, Howell RW, Erdi AK, Aydogan B, Costes S, Watson EE, et al.: MIRD pamphlet No. 17: the dosimetry of nonuniform activity distributions–radionuclide S values at the voxel level. Medical Internal Radiation Dose Committee. J Nucl Med 1999, 40:11S-36S.PubMed 26. Trotti A, Colevas AD, Setser A, Rusch V, Jaques D, Budach V, Langer C, Murphy B, Cumberlin R, Coleman CN, et al.: CTCAE v3.0: development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment. Semin Radiat Oncol 2003, 13:176–181.PubMedCrossRef 27. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, et al.: New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009, 45:228–247.PubMedCrossRef 28.