The purpose of this study was to investigate publication rates in the Spine

Society of Europe (SSE), compare them with the results for American spine societies, and determine factors affecting publication.

All 839 abstracts of podium and poster presentations at SSE congresses held in 2000-2003 were investigated. PRs in peer-reviewed journals within a period of 5 years this website were assessed. Subgroup analyses were performed for different study types. The consistency of abstracts with publications was also analyzed.

The overall PR was 37.8%, with a mean of 17.7 +/- A 15.7 months between congress and publication and a mean impact factor of 1.8 +/- A 1.0 at the time of publication. Comparatively high PRs were found for podium presentations versus posters, studies with higher versus lower levels of evidence, experimental versus clinical studies,

prospective versus retrospective studies, randomized versus nonrandomized studies, studies reporting significant main results versus those without, and multicenter studies versus single-center studies. Biomechanical studies also achieved high PRs.

The PR was similar to that of NASS (40%) and only slightly inferior to that of SRS (47%) and ISSLS (45%). This shows the high quality GSK923295 of presentations at SSE congresses. The fate of unpublished abstracts is worth further consideration. It is questionable whether it is acceptable to cite abstracts that have not passed a journal’s peer-review process and to implement their results in clinical practice.”
“BACKGROUND: The increasing cost of fossil fuels as well as the escalating social and industrial awareness of the environmental impacts associated with the use of fossil fuels has created the need for more sustainable fuel options. Bioethanol, selleck inhibitor produced from renewable biomass such as sugar and starch materials, is believed to be one of these options, and it is currently being harnessed extensively. However, the utilization of sugar and starch materials as feedstocks for bioethanol production creates a major competition with the food market in terms of land for cultivation, and this makes bioethanol from these sources economically less

attractive.

RESULT: This study explores the suitability of microalgae (Chlorococurn sp.) as a substrate for bioethanol production via yeast (Saccharomyces bayanus) under different fermentation conditions. Results show a maximum ethanol concentration of 3.83 g L-1 obtained from 10 g L-1 of lipid-extracted microalgae debris.

CONCLUSION: This productivity level (similar to 38% w/w), which is in keeping with that of current production systems endorses microalgae as a promising substrate for bioethanol production. (c) 2009 Society of Chemical Industry”
“Background: Respiratory support in very preterm infants is often a life-saving procedure and several techniques are available. There is lack of data on the current use of these techniques.