The absence of attenuation of the aidB mutant in HeLa cells or in RAW264.7 macrophages suggests that such alkylating agents are not crucial for the control of the number of c.f.u. during infection of these cell lines. Our data do not confirm the previous observation that a transpositional aidB mutant was attenuated in THP-1 macrophages [10], unless these specific macrophages have specific features differentiating them from RAW264.7 macrophages for the generation

of an alkylating stress. In Salmonella enterica, an aidB mutant was more sensitive than the wild-type strain to several alkylating agents CHIR-99021 molecular weight but presented no effect on the virulence in the mouse model. Indeed, the virulence of a S. enterica mutant defective STI571 in all genes specifically involved in DNA alkylation damage repair was not affected [23]. Recently, in C. crescentus, Radhakrishnan et al. reported that KidO, an NAD(P)-binding oxidoreductase homolog with conserved residues in its NAD(P)-binding pocket, acts directly on the FtsZ tubulin [24]. Localization of KidO to the Z-ring is disrupted by mutations in the cofactor-binding pocket that disturb the association with NAD(P), implying

that NAD(P) binding is important for the recruitment of KidO to the Z-ring [24]. In this context, it should be interesting to construct a mutated AidB defective for FAD binding and observe the impact of this mutation on the AidB-YFP localization. Finally, the selective advantage of AidB recruitment at the new pole remains to be discovered. One possibility would be that crucial regions of the nucleoid located close to the new pole, such as replication origins, could be more protected from alkylating agents. This would resemble the proposed specific triclocarban protection of genes by AidB in

E. coli [25] that would be dependent on subcellular localization of AidB in B. abortus. The https://www.selleckchem.com/products/gs-9973.html aberrant morphology of the strain overexpressing aidB indicates that either growth or division are affected, which suggest that AidB could be (indirectly) involved in the control of these processes, for example by providing a checkpoint for cell division. Conclusion AidB is induced during alkylation damage response in E. coli, however its molecular function is mostly unknown. Here we report that a B. abortus aidB mutant is more sensitive to EMS, suggesting that AidB is playing a functional role in the response to alkylation damage. The AidB-YFP fusion is a marker of new poles (Figures 2 and 6). The AidB-YFP fusion is also localized to constriction sites, which could be considered as preparation sites for new poles in dividing cells. AidB molecular function at the new pole is unknown, but it is expected to be active at this site, since its new pole localization is preserved in B. abortus exposed to EMS.