The genetic association between DHCR24 rs600491 polymorphism

\n\nThe genetic association between DHCR24 rs600491 polymorphism and the risk for AD was investigated in 295 Hungarian late-onset AD patients and 204 ethnically matched,

elderly, cognitively healthy control individuals.\n\nThe DHCR24 rs600491 genotype distributions did not differ significantly between the AD and control groups. Stratification according to gender, however, revealed a statistically significant association Alisertib cell line between T/T genotype and AD risk in men, in contrast with the results in women. Our findings indicate a gender dependent effect of DHCR24 rs600491 polymorphism on the susceptibility to AD. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.”
“The readily available and inexpensive new chiral oxazolidine 2a in combination with Ti(O(i)Pr)(4) was found to catalyze the reaction of an alkynylzinc

reagent with various types of aldehydes to generate chiral propargylic alcohols with high enantioselectivities ( up to 95%) selleck inhibitor and excellent yields ( up to 98%).”
“Background\n\nImpaction grafting is a technique to restore bone loss both in the femur and the acetabulum during revision hip arthroplasty surgery. Initially impaction grafting was undertaken using fresh frozen femoral head allografts that were milled to create morselized bone pieces that could be impacted to create a neo-cancellous bone bed prior to cementation of the new implant. Results of medium and long term outcome studies have shown variable results using this technique. Currently both processed and non-processed allograft bone are used and the purpose of this review was to analyse the evidence for both.\n\nObjectives\n\nTo

determine the clinical effectiveness of processed (freeze dried or irradiated) bone in comparison click here to fresh frozen (unprocessed) bone.\n\nSearch strategy\n\nWe searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (1985 to 2008), EMBASE (1985 to 2008), CINAHL(1985 to 2008) and the National Research Register. Additional sources were also searched. Handsearching of relevant journals and conference abstracts was also undertaken. Searches were complete to 31 August 2008.\n\nSelection criteria\n\nRandomised controlled trials that compared different types of bone for impaction grafting.\n\nData collection and analysis\n\nThree hundred and sixty references were identified from the searches. Following detailed eligibility screening, three hundred and fifty nine references did not meet the eligibility criteria. Further details are required about one trial in order to determine it’s eligibility.\n\nMain results\n\nNo trials were identified that met the criteria for inclusion in the review.

Comments are closed.