europathy, diarrhea, or alopecia has been observed. Elvitegravir Integrase inhibitor Additional parameters include the toxicity effects observed in patients, effect of these drugs on diseasefree and overall survival, and the effect of these drugs when used with other chemotherapy agents. These drugs may be particularly effective in combination with drugs that depend on the spindle checkpoint such as taxanes and others. However, the dose limiting cytopenias seen with AURKA inhibitors so far mandate careful phase I studies to assess the safest combinations of these drugs with potentially less overlapping toxicity. One question for the future will therefore be: are there tumors that are exceptionally sensitive to such compounds, enabling delivery of minimally toxic doses that have significant antitumor effects?.
It is clear that we are entering a new era in anti mitotic therapy with the identification and now clinical translation of new targets in mitosis beyond tubulin, but many questions remain Trichostatin A with regard to Aurora function. The answers will be of great interest, not only to basic researchers but to clinicians and patients as well. Both pharmaceutical companies as well as clinicians presently consider Aurora kinases hot property. Pharmaceutical companies are investing in the development of different inhibitors to target Aurora kinases. Correlation of AURKA with tumor progression, interaction with tumor suppressors such as p53, BRCA1, p73, GSK3B, and lats2 is a clear indication of a real connection to oncogenesis. For a clinician, the fact that small molecule Aurora kinase inhibitors could be effective at killing cancer cells has shed more light on these kinases, however, it seems Dar et al.
Page 10 Mol Cancer Ther. Author manuscript, available in PMC 2011 February 2. NIH PA Author Manuscript NIH PA Author Manuscript NIH PA Author Manuscript appropriate to voice a cautionary note as to the overall efficacy of such inhibitors in cancer treatment. Although aurora inhibitors may trigger apoptosis in a proportion of cells and lead to the arrest of tumor growth in model systems, it is notable that these treatments induce a modest increase in the proportion of apoptotic cells. Nothing is known about how the inhibitors cause cell death , to what extent this happens in vivo and whether the long term outcome of their inhibition is favorable for maintaining long term remission.
At face value, inhibition of any kinase required for stable chromosome inheritance is dangerous because of a greater probability of genetic heterogeneity, hence the potential for tumor evolution. Undoubtedly, massive chromosome loss does, in the majority of cells, lead to cell death, but at what point does increased chromosome instability trigger cell death pathways? In addition, AURKB is required for cytokinesis. Its inhibition leads to polyploidization �?a condition that may result in the survival of a severely aneuploidy cancerous cell. Very little is understood of how this is sensed in the cell. There is no doubt that studies are required to ascertain the long term effects of Aurora kinase inhibitors administration in a suitable model organism.
Never the less, the frequent over expression of Aurora kinases in solid tumors and their contribution to biological processes and signaling pathways, critical for cancer cells, highlight them as the rising stars in targeted therapy and the future of personalized therapy in cancer. Acknowledgments This work was supported in part by the Vanderbilt CTSA grant UL1 RR024975 from NCCR/NIH and by the National Cancer Institute Grant CA131225. The contents of this work are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute or Vanderbilt University Medical Center. References 1. Adams RR, Carm