All patients had small bowel disease, but 3/6 also had colonic in

All patients had small bowel disease, but 3/6 also had colonic involvement. No patient had a prior thromboembolic history or demonstrable hypercoagulability. One patient had an acute SMV thrombus demonstrable on CT scanning, the remaining patients showed an obliteration of superior mesenteric vein. Two patients received anticoagulation upon diagnosis

of thrombosis. No subsequent thromboembolic events were recorded.

Conclusions: The incidence of mesenteric vein thrombosis is likely to be underestimated in patients with Crohn’s disease. Both CT and MRI imaging demonstrate the extent of enteric disease and coincident SMV thrombosis. In our cohort, thrombosis was associated with stricturing disease of the small

bowel. The clinical impact of SMV thrombosis and whether anticoagulation is mandatory for all of these VX-680 supplier patients remains to be determined. (C) INCB28060 2011 European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.”
“Detection of fetal sex based on fetal DNA present in maternal plasma is already in clinical use. Here we present a case of false positivity during the first trimester which may be attributable to a vanishing twin. The presence of Y-chromosome-specific sequences is used as a marker to indicate a male fetus and the absence of a female fetus. Fetal sex determination was conducted in a pregnant woman at gestational week 10. The sample was positive in all triplicates. Ultrasonography at gestational week

XMU-MP-1 price 20 revealed female sex. Analysis of sample taken at gestational week 22 indicated a female fetus. According to recently published meta-analyses, non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal sex has high sensitivity and specificity values. Nevertheless, false negative and false positive cases occur. Future studies focusing on the dynamics of fetal DNA are needed. Vanishing twin might be one of the possible causes of false positivity in fetal sex determination.”
“P>Periorbital dermatitis is common and frequently difficult to treat. Patients with periorbital dermatitis often suffer severely because their disease is in such a visible location. Because of the variety of clinical appearance, the differential diagnostic considerations are often difficult. We examined the causes of periorbital dermatitis and compared the data of 88 patients from the Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen to those of the German IVDK (Information Network of the Departments of Dermatology). Between 1999 and 2004, predominant causes of periorbital dermatitis were allergic contact dermatitis (Erlangen 44 %, IVDK 32 %), atopic eczema (Erlangen 25 %, IVDK 14 %), airborne contact dermatitis (Erlangen 10 %, IVDK 2 %) and irritant contact dermatitis (Erlangen 9 %, IVDK 8 %). Less frequent causes for secondary eczematous periocular skin lesions were periorbital rosacea, allergic conjunctivitis or psoriasis vulgaris.

Comments are closed.