The UK framework for marine permitting and planning contains a di

The UK framework for marine permitting and planning contains a diverse array of measures designed to exert a coordinating influence on its component rules and www.selleckchem.com/products/dabrafenib-gsk2118436.html decision-making bodies. Key coordinating measures are outlined below: As noted previously, the Marine Policy Statement and associated Marine Plans influence decision-making by all relevant public bodies, who are required to either take them into account (‘have regard to’ in the case of the Planning Inspectorate) [104] and [105] or act consistently with them ‘unless relevant considerations indicate otherwise’ (in the case of the other public bodies). Subject to several

exceptions set out in the Planning Act 2008 (section 104) decisions by the Planning Inspectorate/Secretary Selleck MDV3100 of State concerning offshore NSIPs must also be taken in accordance with relevant National Policy Statements. The ‘relevant considerations’ exception referred to above is broadly framed and rather unclear [106]. It does however have a close equivalent in UK terrestrial planning law, namely the ‘unless material considerations indicate otherwise’ exception which is subject to a large body of judicial clarification and interpretation

[107]. In any event, the requirement to state reasons justifying departures from marine planning documents represents as a significant political disincentive to un-coordinated decision-making. The exception also maintains consistency between the National Policy Statements and the Marine Policy Statement, because provisions of the former can be characterised as ‘relevant considerations’ which justify permitting decisions that

depart from the latter. Several marine permitting requirements contain exceptions designed to minimise duplication and sectoral overlaps. Key examples referred to in Section 3 above include the: omission from the MCAA Abiraterone purchase marine licensing framework of offshore CO2 storage activities licensed under the Energy Act 2008 and Petroleum Act 1998; policy under the Energy Act 2008 of refusing applications for CO2 storage licences that potentially conflict with oil and gas operations; linkage under the Energy Act 2008 between CO2 storage licence areas and the boundaries of corresponding Crown Estate leases/licences; power of the Secretary of State under the Petroleum Act 1998 to ‘have regard’ to various matters including offshore windfarms and CO2 storage; Petroleum Act 1998 Model Clauses addressing potential conflicts with fishing and navigation; and rights retained by the Crown Estate Commissioners to terminate leases in areas where oil and gas works are authorised under the Petroleum Act 1998. In the manner depicted in Fig.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>