Libraries aureus ATCC 25923, local isolates of methicillin resistant S. aureus BHU 011 and Enterococcus faecalis were used in this study. Antibiotic sensitivity BLU9931 cost pattern of these test organisms were tested by using FDA recommended antibiotics and standard methodology. The freshly collected leaves were washed with distilled water and air-dried at 40 °C

and powdered. The powdered material was extracted with different solvents (Hexane, Methanol and water) by freeze- thaw method. The extracts were collected in sterile bottles, reduced to dryness and stored at 2–8 °C until use. Qualitative antibacterial assays were performed by agar well diffusion method. Different volumes (50–300 μl) of extracts dissolved in distilled water (10 mg/ml) were directly applied to the wells made on surface of MHA containing bacterial lawn. Control wells received only distilled water. Positive control wells received streptomycin

(10 μg) except in case of MRSA and E. faecalis, where streptomycin (300 μg) was used as positive control. After diffusion, plates were incubated at 37 °C for 18 h and zones of growth inhibition were measured. Antimycobacterial activity of the plant extracts was tested by Indirect proportion method. The assay was performed on LJ medium with or without the plant extracts (05–20 mg ml−1). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by agar PFI-2 solubility dmso dilution method. The concentration of plant extracts used were in the range of 0.25–08 mg ml−1 and plates without any extracts were used as control for MIC determination. 75% methanol extracts of A. paniculata leaves were subjected to thin layer chromatography (TLC) for separation of antibacterial fraction. Silica gel-60 was used as stationary phase

whereas the mobile phase was the mixture of chloroform and methanol (7:3). The bands were visualized in a UV transilluminator and the position of bands was marked. The bands were scratched from TLC plates, dissolved in methanol, reduced to dryness, redissolved in deionized water and tested for its antibacterial activity against S. aureus ATCC 25923 by Macrobroth dilution method. The active fraction was subjected to various phytochemical tests according to conventional methods 7 to determine its chemical nature. Primary screening test, the qualitative antibacterial assay revealed many that out of the nine different extracts, only methanol extract of A. paniculata leaves posses antibacterial activity against S. aureus ATCC 25923. The methanol extracts of leaves from other two plants, A. maculatum and T. cardifolia exhibited no activity against the pathogens tested ( Table 1). Further, A. paniculata leaves were extracted using different concentrations of methanol as solvent and were assayed for antibacterial activity. These assays revealed the highest activity in 75% methanolic extract ( Table 2). Moreover, 75% methanolic extract of A.