(2005), M silvestris prefers acetate over methane as a growth su

(2005), M. silvestris prefers acetate over methane as a growth substrate, possibly due

to the requirement of reducing equivalents for the initial oxidation of methane to methanol, and because acetate concentrations can be quite high in Sphagnum peat bogs where this strain was isolated. As a result it appears that facultative methanotrophic Methylocella strains have an effective regulatory network to control MMO expression. Conversely, the facultative Methylocystis strains H2s and SB2 were found to constitutively express pMMO regardless if these strains were grown on methane or acetate (Belova et al., 2011; Yoon et al., 2011). Expression of pmoA, a key functional gene of the pMMO however, was significantly greater when Methylocystis strain SB2 was grown on methane than on acetate (Yoon et al., 2011). As described above, these strains show weaker growth on acetate. It may be that these strains check details use acetate as

a secondary carbon or reducing source that enables the continued expression of MMO in the absence of methane such that these strains can readily utilize methane when it becomes more available (Dunfield, 2007; Belova et al., 2011). These strains, however, were also isolated from bogs where acetate concentrations can be expected to be high (Duddleston et al., 2002), thus, the ability to control MMO expression may have other origins. It is interesting to note that sMMO expression in Methylococcus capsulatus Bath is repressed at high copper concentrations, while pMMO is constitutively expressed but its expression increases with increasing copper concentration (Choi INCB018424 chemical structure et al., 2003). The finding that sMMO expression by M. silvestris is repressed in the presence of acetate while pMMO expression is constitutive and positively regulated by the carbon source in Methylocystis strain SB2 suggests that the regulatory pathway of sMMO/pMMO expression used by facultative

and obligate methanotrophs have some similarities. It may be that Methylocella species were originally facultative methylotrophs, later generating the ability to utilize methane as a growth substrate through lateral gene transfer of the genes for the sMMO, and subsequently developed the ability to control MMO expression with respect to carbon source. This is intriguing as Methylocella species are the only known methanotrophs lacking pMMO. By extension, M. aurea may also have been methylotrophic, but through MRIP lateral gene transfer developed the ability to express pMMO. To the best of our knowledge, however, it should be stressed that it has not yet been reported whether M. aurea expresses pMMO when grown on acetate. Although the origin of facultative methanotrophy from methylotrophs in these strains is speculative, it is interesting to note that a facultative methylotroph, Methylobacterium extorquens AM1, when engineered to express the ammonia monooxygenase (AMO) of Paracoccus denitrificans, was able to grow on methane as the sole carbon source (Crossman et al., 1997).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>